binaryHealthCare.com

Bridging the EHealth Divide

Archive for November, 2008

Outsourcing is hot; don’t get burned

Posted by Adam Chee on November 5, 2008

 I like this article on tele-radiology, it highlight several points that has been floating on my mind (I really need to find a way to manufacture time so I can write articles).
Teleradiology and the outsourcing of imaging studies continue to proliferate, but that doesn’t mean they are always the right answer. Questions often arise over risks and rewards related to the practice, and how those risks and rewards vary among different practice models.

“Outsourcing is a topic we [radiologists] need to understand well if we are to make informed choices about the future of radiology, our practices, and our own careers,” said Dr. Richard B. Gunderman, an associate professor of radiology at Indiana University.

Many hospital operations have been outsourced for years, including billing, payroll, cafeteria, laundry, housekeeping, and medical transcription. More recently, hospitals and imaging clinics have begun outsourcing after-hours interpretations. As of 2005, 20% of all U.S. hospitals were using after-hours radiology services.

Gunderman recently published an outsourcing primer that explores the nature of outsourcing and also defines and discusses the subtle distinctions between outsourcing, offshoring, offshore outsourcing, and inshoring (JACR 2008;5[8]:893-899).

His paper includes guidelines for radiology practices contemplating outsourcing, including an examination of outsourcing risks and risk mitigation. Risks are presented in the context of a hypothetical rural hospital with two general radiologists who wish to outsource neuroradiology, mammography, and overnight emergency studies.

Risks include outsourcing the wrong studies, outsourcing too many studies, choosing the wrong vendor, legal factors, and resistance from in-house physicians.

Risk mitigation involves:

  • carefully reviewing the purpose of the outsourcing venture and specifically designating which studies are outsource candidates;  
  • performing dry runs to see which imaging studies need to be outsourced and how many are likely to be involved;  
  • seeking references for potential vendors and evaluating their approaches to workflow, billing, malpractice, and performance standards; and  
  • verifying that potential vendors are economically stable and pose no legal risks.

The most costly aspects of outsourcing are not financial in nature, Gunderman said.

“As an increasing percentage of radiologic services are outsourced, radiology itself may undergo undesirable changes,” he said.

One such change is the loss of patient contact and the opportunity to build patient-physician relationships. A related problem concerns loss of continuity of care. A patient’s ongoing imaging studies may be interpreted by different radiologists, none of whom sees the process evolve over time.

Outsourcing and related offshoring, offshore outsourcing, and inshoring practices play important roles in the evolving global marketplace, and often promote valuable competition and innovation, Gunderman said.

“Yet outsourcing per se is not necessarily a good thing, and in some cases, its risks and costs may outweigh its benefits,” he said. “Radiologists need to understand these in both the short and the long term.”

Food for thought mates :)

 

Posted in Blog - Health IT, Blog - Medical & Healthcare | 2 Comments »

Philips, King’s College London to research imaging heart disease

Posted by Adam Chee on November 4, 2008

“Royal Philips Electronics has signed a new memorandum of understanding for a five-year cardiovascular imaging research collaboration with King’s College London.

Under the agreement, Philips and King’s College London’s division of imaging sciences will develop new medical imaging research projects with a particular focus on cardiology and cardiac electrophysiology. One of the key areas of focus will be on combining different imaging technologies, such as x-ray, MRI, ultrasound and CT, to help doctors navigate their way through a patient’s heart during minimally invasive procedures.

The new agreement will also seek to establish new research projects into medical imaging for cardiovascular disease, cardiac arrhythmias and pediatric diseases”

I applaud Philip’s strategic move in establishing this key research site, I think it will help them further develop and fine tune their cardiology solutions into leading edge offerings that will truly help institutes improve patient care while (hopefully) reducing cost, in a few years from now.

Well done.

Posted in Blog - Medical & Healthcare | Leave a Comment »

Choosing next PACS gets complicated, especially where RIS is concerned

Posted by Adam Chee on November 4, 2008

One debate currently flourishing in the imaging informatics community is whether to go with single or multiple vendors when purchasing or replacing a RIS or PACS.”

I reckon the reason why such debates still exists are due to the lack of sites like binaryhealthcare :)

Radiology PACS has been around a long time now, I gather there are sites actually going through a third cycle replacement for legacy systems and in yet the concept of integrated RIS/PACS have not caught on totally. Granted that the “best of breed” theory does hold its fort but surely there exists a suitable for each facility.

Ok, I jested :)

Back to the topic, as mentioned in the original article, “An important consideration is whether to replace the RIS at the same time. Continuing with an outdated RIS often leads to disappointment in the new acquisition because an older RIS can interfere with improvements offered by newer PACS”.

And for the records,  I agree with most of the quotes found in the article, integrated RIS/PACS is the way to go, you get less “finger pointing”, single contact, less cost (license, manpower, hardware, electricity etc etc), I’d however, like to point out that there is a huge difference between integrated and interfaced.

Truly integrated solutions (not just single-vendor solutions) will also deliver more efficient workflow as a single database will reduce the turnaround time (as opposed to systems that are interfaced), in addition, the numerous benefits mentioned above will only be fully realised if the solution is an integrated one.

However, the original article has several points worth mulling over, you can access it here.

Posted in Blog - Health IT | Leave a Comment »